You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
38 lines
1.6 KiB
38 lines
1.6 KiB
10 years ago
|
---
|
||
|
layout: post
|
||
|
title: MicroSD sloppy review
|
||
|
created: 1382415956
|
||
|
categories:
|
||
|
- review
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
<!--break-->
|
||
|
I don't know if I could call this a review, but I would like to show how they performed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sipp11/10415376165/" title="microSD by sipp11, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2870/10415376165_accb35bd27.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="microSD"></a>
|
||
|
|
||
|
I bought these two at
|
||
|
Kingston costs 700THB (~22.5USD)
|
||
|
SanDisk costs 490THB (~15.75USD)
|
||
|
considering Kingston was twice the size, I didn't expect much from it. However, my jaw was dropping and conducting test again and again to see if I was wrong.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I know this is just a sloppy test of how it performed:-
|
||
|
|
||
|
For Kingston one.
|
||
|
|
||
|
root@840evo:~|⇒ dd if=xubuntu-13.04-desktop_armhf_odroidxu_20130917_HDMI.img of=/dev/sdd bs=4M
|
||
|
1410+0 records in
|
||
|
1410+0 records out
|
||
|
5913968640 bytes (5.9 GB) copied, 408.31 s, 14.5 MB/s
|
||
|
|
||
|
SanDisk one.
|
||
|
|
||
|
root@840evo:~|⇒ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd bs=4M
|
||
|
3799+0 records in
|
||
|
3798+0 records out
|
||
|
15931539456 bytes (16 GB) copied, 1520.28 s, 10.5 MB/s
|
||
|
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd bs=4M 0.00s user 16.73s system 1% cpu 25:20.28 total
|
||
|
|
||
|
It didn't matter how large file was, Kingston was definitely better. I had tried many times with wide ranges of files including /dev/zero, results were just the same. I have used the same card reader, Lexar USB3 one, same adapter. Maybe I was wrong. I thought SanDisk was always superior to Kingston, esp. at the same class and pricier.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I hope this help change someone's mind out there thinking like I did.
|