flask/docs/security.rst

Security Considerations
=======================

Web applications usually face all kinds of security problems and it's very
hard to get everything right.  Flask tries to solve a few of these things
for you, but there are a couple more you have to take care of yourself.

.. _xss:

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
--------------------------

Cross site scripting is the concept of injecting arbitrary HTML (and with
it JavaScript) into the context of a website.  To rememdy this, developers
have to properly escape text so that it cannot include arbitrary HTML
tags.  For more information on that have a look at the Wikipedia article
on `Cross-Site Scripting
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting>`_.

Flask configures Jinja2 to automatically escape all values unless
explicitly told otherwise.  This should rule out all XSS problems caused
in templates, but there are still other places where you have to be
careful:

-   generating HTML without the help of Jinja2
-   calling :class:`~flask.Markup` on data submitted by users
-   sending out HTML from uploaded files, never do that, use the
    `Content-Disposition: attachment` header to prevent that problem.
-   sending out textfiles from uploaded files.  Some browsers are using
    content-type guessing based on the first few bytes so users could
    trick a browser to execute HTML.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
---------------------------------

Another big problem is CSRF.  This is a very complex topic and I won't
outline it here in detail just mention what it is and how to theoretically
prevent it.

So if your authentication information is stored in cookies you have
implicit state management.  By that I mean that the state of "being logged
in" is controlled by a cookie and that cookie is sent with each request to
a page.  Unfortunately that really means "each request" so also requests
triggered by 3rd party sites.  If you don't keep that in mind some people
might be able to trick your application's users with social engineering to
do stupid things without them knowing.

Say you have a specific URL that, when you sent `POST` requests to will
delete a user's profile (say `http://example.com/user/delete`).  If an
attacker now creates a page that sents a post request to that page with
some JavaScript he just has to trick some users to that page and their
profiles will end up being deleted.

Imagine you would run Facebook with millions of concurrent users and
someone would send out links to images of little kittens.  When a user
would go to that page their profiles would get deleted while they are
looking at images of fluffy cats.

So how can you prevent yourself from that?  Basically for each request
that modifies content on the server you would have to either use a
one-time token and store that in the cookie **and** also transmit it with
the form data.   After recieving the data on the server again you would
then have to compare the two tokens and ensure they are equal.

Why does not Flask do that for you?  The ideal place for this to happen is
the form validation framework which does not exist in Flask.

.. _json-security:

JSON Security
-------------

JSON itself is a high-level serialization format, so there is barely
anything that could cause security problems, right?  You can't declare
recursive structures that could cause problems and the only thing that
could possibly break are very large responses that can cause some kind of
denial of service at the receiver's side.

However there is a catch.  Due to how browsers work the CSRF issue comes
up with JSON unfortunately.  Fortunately there is also a weird part of the
JavaScript specification that can be used to solve that problem easily and
Flask is kinda doing that for you by preventing you from doing dangerous
stuff.  Unfortunately that protection is only there for
:func:`~flask.jsonify` so you are still at risk when using other ways to
generate JSON.

So what is the issue and how to avoid it?  The problem are arrays at
toplevel in JSON.  Imagine you send the following data out in a JSON
request.  Say that's exporting the names and email adresses of all your
friends for a part of the userinterface that is written in JavaScript.
Not very uncommon:

.. sourcecode:: javascript

    [
        {"username": "admin",
         "email": "admin@localhost"}
    ]

And it is doing that of course only as long as you are logged in and only
for you.  And it is doing that for all `GET` requests to a certain URL,
say the URL for that request is
``http://example.com/api/get_friends.json``.

So now what happens if a clever hacker is embedding this to his website
and social engineers a victim to visiting his site:

.. sourcecode:: html

    <script type=text/javascript>
    var captured = [];
    var oldArray = Array;
    function Array() {
      var obj = this, id = 0, capture = function(value) {
        obj.__defineSetter__(id++, capture);
        if (value)
          captured.push(value);
      };
      capture();
    }
    </script>
    <script type=text/javascript
      src=http://example.com/api/get_friends.json></script>
    <script type=text/javascript>
    Array = oldArray;
    // now we have all the data in the captured array.
    </script>

If you know a bit of JavaScript internals you might know that it's
possible to patch constructors and register callbacks for setters.  An
attacker can use this (like above) to get all the data you exported in
your JSON file.  The browser will totally ignore the ``application/json``
mimetype if ``text/javascript`` is defined as content type in the script
tag and evaluate that as JavaScript.  Because toplevel array elements are
allowed (albeit useless) and we hooked in our own constructor, after that
page loaded the data from the JSON response is in the `captured` array.

Because it is a syntax error in JavaScript to have an object literal
(``{...}``) toplevel an attacker could not just do a request to an
external URL with the script tag to load up the data.  So what Flask does
is only allowing objects as toplevel elements when using
:func:`~flask.jsonify`.  Make sure to do the same when using an ordinary
JSON generate function.