mirror of https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
231 lines
9.2 KiB
231 lines
9.2 KiB
14 years ago
|
.. _request-context:
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Request Context
|
||
|
===================
|
||
|
|
||
|
This document describes the behavior in Flask 0.7 which is mostly in line
|
||
|
with the old behavior but has some small, subtle differences.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One of the design ideas behind Flask is that there are two different
|
||
|
“states” in which code is executed. The application setup state in which
|
||
|
the application implicitly is on the module level. It starts when the
|
||
|
:class:`Flask` object is instantiated, and it implicitly ends when the
|
||
|
first request comes in. While the application is in this state a few
|
||
|
assumptions are true:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- the programmer can modify the application object safely.
|
||
|
- no request handling happened so far
|
||
|
- you have to have a reference to the application object in order to
|
||
|
modify it, there is no magic proxy that can give you a reference to
|
||
|
the application object you're currently creating or modifying.
|
||
|
|
||
|
On the contrast, during request handling, a couple of other rules exist:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- while a request is active, the context local objects
|
||
|
(:data:`flask.request` and others) point to the current request.
|
||
|
- any code can get hold of these objects at any time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The magic that makes this works is internally referred in Flask as the
|
||
|
“request context”.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Diving into Context Locals
|
||
|
--------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Say you have a utility function that returns the URL the user should be
|
||
|
redirected to. Imagine it would always redirect to the URL's ``next``
|
||
|
parameter or the HTTP referrer or the index page::
|
||
|
|
||
|
from flask import request, url_for
|
||
|
|
||
|
def redirect_url():
|
||
|
return request.args.get('next') or \
|
||
|
request.referrer or \
|
||
|
url_for('index')
|
||
|
|
||
|
As you can see, it accesses the request object. If you try to run this
|
||
|
from a plain Python shell, this is the exception you will see:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>>> redirect_url()
|
||
|
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
|
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
|
||
|
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'request'
|
||
|
|
||
|
That makes a lot of sense because we currently do not have a request we
|
||
|
could access. So we have to make a request and bind it to the current
|
||
|
context. The :attr:`~flask.Flask.test_request_context` method can create
|
||
|
us a :class:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext`:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>>> ctx = app.test_request_context('/?next=http://example.com/')
|
||
|
|
||
|
This context can be used in two ways. Either with the `with` statement
|
||
|
or by calling the :meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.push` and
|
||
|
:meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.pop` methods:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>>> ctx.push()
|
||
|
|
||
|
From that point onwards you can work with the request object:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>>> redirect_url()
|
||
|
u'http://example.com/'
|
||
|
|
||
|
Until you call `pop`:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>>> ctx.pop()
|
||
|
|
||
|
Because the request context is internally maintained as a stack you can
|
||
|
push and pop multiple times. This is very handy to implement things like
|
||
|
internal redirects.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more information of how to utilize the request context from the
|
||
|
interactive Python shell, head over to the :ref:`shell` chapter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
How the Context Works
|
||
|
---------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you look into how the Flask WSGI application internally works, you will
|
||
|
find a piece of code that looks very much like this::
|
||
|
|
||
|
def wsgi_app(self, environ):
|
||
|
with self.request_context(environ):
|
||
|
try:
|
||
|
response = self.full_dispatch_request()
|
||
|
except Exception, e:
|
||
|
response = self.make_response(self.handle_exception(e))
|
||
|
return response(environ, start_response)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The method :meth:`~Flask.request_context` returns a new
|
||
|
:class:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext` object and uses it in combination with
|
||
|
the `with` statement to bind the context. Everything that is called from
|
||
|
the same thread from this point onwards until the end of the `with`
|
||
|
statement will have access to the request globals (:data:`flask.request`
|
||
|
and others).
|
||
|
|
||
|
The request context internally works like a stack: The topmost level on
|
||
|
the stack is the current active request.
|
||
|
:meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.push` adds the context to the stack on
|
||
|
the very top, :meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.pop` removes it from the
|
||
|
stack again. On popping the application's
|
||
|
:func:`~flask.Flask.teardown_request` functions are also executed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. _callbacks-and-errors:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Callbacks and Errors
|
||
|
--------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
What happens if an error occurs in Flask during request processing? This
|
||
|
particular behavior changed in 0.7 because we wanted to make it easier to
|
||
|
understand what is actually happening. The new behavior is quite simple:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Before each request, :meth:`~flask.Flask.before_request` functions are
|
||
|
executed. If one of these functions return a response, the other
|
||
|
functions are no longer called. In any case however the return value
|
||
|
is treated as a replacement for the view's return value.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. If the :meth:`~flask.Flask.before_request` functions did not return a
|
||
|
response, the regular request handling kicks in and the view function
|
||
|
that was matched has the chance to return a response.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The return value of the view is then converted into an actual response
|
||
|
object and handed over to the :meth:`~flask.Flask.after_request`
|
||
|
functions which have the chance to replace it or modify it in place.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. At the end of the request the :meth:`~flask.Flask.teardown_request`
|
||
|
functions are executed. This always happens, even in case of an
|
||
|
unhandled exception down the road.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now what happens on errors? In production mode if an exception is not
|
||
|
caught, the 500 internal server handler is called. In development mode
|
||
|
however the exception is not further processed and bubbles up to the WSGI
|
||
|
server. That way things like the interactive debugger can provide helpful
|
||
|
debug information.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An important change in 0.7 is that the internal server error is now no
|
||
|
longer post processed by the after request callbacks and after request
|
||
|
callbacks are no longer guaranteed to be executed. This way the internal
|
||
|
dispatching code looks cleaner and is easier to customize and understand.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The new teardown functions are supposed to be used as a replacement for
|
||
|
things that absolutely need to happen at the end of request.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Teardown Callbacks
|
||
|
------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
The teardown callbacks are special callbacks in that they are executed at
|
||
|
at different point. Strictly speaking they are independent of the actual
|
||
|
request handling as they are bound to the lifecycle of the
|
||
|
:class:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext` object. When the request context is
|
||
|
popped, the :meth:`~flask.Flask.teardown_request` functions are called.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is important to know if the life of the request context is prolonged
|
||
|
by using the test client in a with statement of when using the request
|
||
|
context from the command line::
|
||
|
|
||
|
with app.test_client() as client:
|
||
|
resp = client.get('/foo')
|
||
|
# the teardown functions are still not called at that point
|
||
|
# even though the response ended and you have the response
|
||
|
# object in your hand
|
||
|
|
||
|
# only when the code reaches this point the teardown functions
|
||
|
# are called. Alternatively the same thing happens if another
|
||
|
# request was triggered from the test client
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's easy to see the behavior from the command line:
|
||
|
|
||
|
>>> app = Flask(__name__)
|
||
|
>>> @app.teardown_request
|
||
|
... def after_request(exception=None):
|
||
|
... print 'after request'
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
>>> ctx = app.test_request_context()
|
||
|
>>> ctx.push()
|
||
|
>>> ctx.pop()
|
||
|
after request
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. _notes-on-proxies:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Notes On Proxies
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some of the objects provided by Flask are proxies to other objects. The
|
||
|
reason behind this is that these proxies are shared between threads and
|
||
|
they have to dispatch to the actual object bound to a thread behind the
|
||
|
scenes as necessary.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Most of the time you don't have to care about that, but there are some
|
||
|
exceptions where it is good to know that this object is an actual proxy:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- The proxy objects do not fake their inherited types, so if you want to
|
||
|
perform actual instance checks, you have to do that on the instance
|
||
|
that is being proxied (see `_get_current_object` below).
|
||
|
- if the object reference is important (so for example for sending
|
||
|
:ref:`signals`)
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you need to get access to the underlying object that is proxied, you
|
||
|
can use the :meth:`~werkzeug.local.LocalProxy._get_current_object` method::
|
||
|
|
||
|
app = current_app._get_current_object()
|
||
|
my_signal.send(app)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Context Preservation on Error
|
||
|
-----------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
If an error occurs or not, at the end of the request the request context
|
||
|
is popped and all data associated with it is destroyed. During
|
||
|
development however that can be problematic as you might want to have the
|
||
|
information around for a longer time in case an exception occurred. In
|
||
|
Flask 0.6 and earlier in debug mode, if an exception occurred, the
|
||
|
request context was not popped so that the interactive debugger can still
|
||
|
provide you with important information.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Starting with Flask 0.7 you have finer control over that behavior by
|
||
|
setting the ``PRESERVE_CONTEXT_ON_EXCEPTION`` configuration variable. By
|
||
|
default it's linked to the setting of ``DEBUG``. If the application is in
|
||
|
debug mode the context is preserved, in production mode it's not.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Do not force activate ``PRESERVE_CONTEXT_ON_EXCEPTION`` in production mode
|
||
|
as it will cause your application to leak memory on exceptions. However
|
||
|
it can be useful during development to get the same error preserving
|
||
|
behavior as in development mode when attempting to debug an error that
|
||
|
only occurs under production settings.
|