|
|
|
.. _app-factories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application Factories
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are already using packages and blueprints for your application
|
|
|
|
(:ref:`blueprints`) there are a couple of really nice ways to further improve
|
|
|
|
the experience. A common pattern is creating the application object when
|
|
|
|
the blueprint is imported. But if you move the creation of this object,
|
|
|
|
into a function, you can then create multiple instances of this and later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So why would you want to do this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Testing. You can have instances of the application with different
|
|
|
|
settings to test every case.
|
|
|
|
2. Multiple instances. Imagine you want to run different versions of the
|
|
|
|
same application. Of course you could have multiple instances with
|
|
|
|
different configs set up in your webserver, but if you use factories,
|
|
|
|
you can have multiple instances of the same application running in the
|
|
|
|
same application process which can be handy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how would you then actually implement that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Factories
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea is to set up the application in a function. Like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def create_app(config_filename):
|
|
|
|
app = Flask(__name__)
|
|
|
|
app.config.from_pyfile(config_filename)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from yourapplication.model import db
|
|
|
|
db.init_app(app)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from yourapplication.views.admin import admin
|
|
|
|
from yourapplication.views.frontend import frontend
|
|
|
|
app.register_blueprint(admin)
|
|
|
|
app.register_blueprint(frontend)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return app
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The downside is that you cannot use the application object in the blueprints
|
|
|
|
at import time. You can however use it from within a request. How do you
|
|
|
|
get access to the application with the config? Use
|
|
|
|
:data:`~flask.current_app`::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from flask import current_app, Blueprint, render_template
|
|
|
|
admin = Blueprint('admin', __name__, url_prefix='/admin')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@admin.route('/')
|
|
|
|
def index():
|
|
|
|
return render_template(current_app.config['INDEX_TEMPLATE'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here we look up the name of a template in the config.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factories & Extensions
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's preferable to create your extensions and app factories so that the
|
|
|
|
extension object does not initially get bound to the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using `Flask-SQLAlchemy <http://pythonhosted.org/Flask-SQLAlchemy/>`_,
|
|
|
|
as an example, you should not do something along those lines::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def create_app(config_filename):
|
|
|
|
app = Flask(__name__)
|
|
|
|
app.config.from_pyfile(config_filename)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But, rather, in model.py (or equivalent)::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
db = SQLAlchemy()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and in your application.py (or equivalent)::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def create_app(config_filename):
|
|
|
|
app = Flask(__name__)
|
|
|
|
app.config.from_pyfile(config_filename)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from yourapplication.model import db
|
|
|
|
db.init_app(app)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using this design pattern, no application-specific state is stored on the
|
|
|
|
extension object, so one extension object can be used for multiple apps.
|
|
|
|
For more information about the design of extensions refer to :doc:`/extensiondev`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Applications
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So to use such an application you then have to create the application
|
|
|
|
first in a separate file otherwise the ``flask`` command won't be able
|
|
|
|
to find it. Here an example :file:`exampleapp.py` file that creates such
|
|
|
|
an application::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from yourapplication import create_app
|
|
|
|
app = create_app('/path/to/config.cfg')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It can then be used with the ``flask`` command::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
flask --app=exampleapp run
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory Improvements
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The factory function from above is not very clever so far, you can improve
|
|
|
|
it. The following changes are straightforward and possible:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. make it possible to pass in configuration values for unittests so that
|
|
|
|
you don't have to create config files on the filesystem
|
|
|
|
2. call a function from a blueprint when the application is setting up so
|
|
|
|
that you have a place to modify attributes of the application (like
|
|
|
|
hooking in before / after request handlers etc.)
|
|
|
|
3. Add in WSGI middlewares when the application is creating if necessary.
|