|
|
|
.. _app-dispatch:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application Dispatching
|
|
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application dispatching is the process of combining multiple Flask
|
|
|
|
applications on the WSGI level. You can not only combine Flask
|
|
|
|
applications into something larger but any WSGI application. This would
|
|
|
|
even allow you to run a Django and a Flask application in the same
|
|
|
|
interpreter side by side if you want. The usefulness of this depends on
|
|
|
|
how the applications work internally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fundamental difference from the :ref:`module approach
|
|
|
|
<larger-applications>` is that in this case you are running the same or
|
|
|
|
different Flask applications that are entirely isolated from each other.
|
|
|
|
They run different configurations and are dispatched on the WSGI level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working with this Document
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of the techniques and examples below results in an ``application`` object
|
|
|
|
that can be run with any WSGI server. For production, see :ref:`deployment`.
|
|
|
|
For development, Werkzeug provides a builtin server for development available
|
|
|
|
at :func:`werkzeug.serving.run_simple`::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from werkzeug.serving import run_simple
|
|
|
|
run_simple('localhost', 5000, application, use_reloader=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that :func:`run_simple <werkzeug.serving.run_simple>` is not intended for
|
|
|
|
use in production. Use a :ref:`full-blown WSGI server <deployment>`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to use the interactive debugger, debugging must be enabled both on
|
|
|
|
the application and the simple server, here is the "hello world" example with
|
|
|
|
debugging and :func:`run_simple <werkzeug.serving.run_simple>`::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from flask import Flask
|
|
|
|
from werkzeug.serving import run_simple
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
app = Flask(__name__)
|
|
|
|
app.debug = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@app.route('/')
|
|
|
|
def hello_world():
|
|
|
|
return 'Hello World!'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
|
|
run_simple('localhost', 5000, app,
|
|
|
|
use_reloader=True, use_debugger=True, use_evalex=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combining Applications
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have entirely separated applications and you want them to work next
|
|
|
|
to each other in the same Python interpreter process you can take
|
|
|
|
advantage of the :class:`werkzeug.wsgi.DispatcherMiddleware`. The idea
|
|
|
|
here is that each Flask application is a valid WSGI application and they
|
|
|
|
are combined by the dispatcher middleware into a larger one that
|
|
|
|
dispatched based on prefix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example you could have your main application run on ``/`` and your
|
|
|
|
backend interface on ``/backend``::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from werkzeug.wsgi import DispatcherMiddleware
|
|
|
|
from frontend_app import application as frontend
|
|
|
|
from backend_app import application as backend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
application = DispatcherMiddleware(frontend, {
|
|
|
|
'/backend': backend
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispatch by Subdomain
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you might want to use multiple instances of the same application
|
|
|
|
with different configurations. Assuming the application is created inside
|
|
|
|
a function and you can call that function to instantiate it, that is
|
|
|
|
really easy to implement. In order to develop your application to support
|
|
|
|
creating new instances in functions have a look at the
|
|
|
|
:ref:`app-factories` pattern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A very common example would be creating applications per subdomain. For
|
|
|
|
instance you configure your webserver to dispatch all requests for all
|
|
|
|
subdomains to your application and you then use the subdomain information
|
|
|
|
to create user-specific instances. Once you have your server set up to
|
|
|
|
listen on all subdomains you can use a very simple WSGI application to do
|
|
|
|
the dynamic application creation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The perfect level for abstraction in that regard is the WSGI layer. You
|
|
|
|
write your own WSGI application that looks at the request that comes and
|
|
|
|
delegates it to your Flask application. If that application does not
|
|
|
|
exist yet, it is dynamically created and remembered::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from threading import Lock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SubdomainDispatcher(object):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, domain, create_app):
|
|
|
|
self.domain = domain
|
|
|
|
self.create_app = create_app
|
|
|
|
self.lock = Lock()
|
|
|
|
self.instances = {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_application(self, host):
|
|
|
|
host = host.split(':')[0]
|
|
|
|
assert host.endswith(self.domain), 'Configuration error'
|
|
|
|
subdomain = host[:-len(self.domain)].rstrip('.')
|
|
|
|
with self.lock:
|
|
|
|
app = self.instances.get(subdomain)
|
|
|
|
if app is None:
|
|
|
|
app = self.create_app(subdomain)
|
|
|
|
self.instances[subdomain] = app
|
|
|
|
return app
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
|
|
|
|
app = self.get_application(environ['HTTP_HOST'])
|
|
|
|
return app(environ, start_response)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This dispatcher can then be used like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from myapplication import create_app, get_user_for_subdomain
|
|
|
|
from werkzeug.exceptions import NotFound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def make_app(subdomain):
|
|
|
|
user = get_user_for_subdomain(subdomain)
|
|
|
|
if user is None:
|
|
|
|
# if there is no user for that subdomain we still have
|
|
|
|
# to return a WSGI application that handles that request.
|
|
|
|
# We can then just return the NotFound() exception as
|
|
|
|
# application which will render a default 404 page.
|
|
|
|
# You might also redirect the user to the main page then
|
|
|
|
return NotFound()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# otherwise create the application for the specific user
|
|
|
|
return create_app(user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
application = SubdomainDispatcher('example.com', make_app)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispatch by Path
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispatching by a path on the URL is very similar. Instead of looking at
|
|
|
|
the ``Host`` header to figure out the subdomain one simply looks at the
|
|
|
|
request path up to the first slash::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from threading import Lock
|
|
|
|
from werkzeug.wsgi import pop_path_info, peek_path_info
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class PathDispatcher(object):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, default_app, create_app):
|
|
|
|
self.default_app = default_app
|
|
|
|
self.create_app = create_app
|
|
|
|
self.lock = Lock()
|
|
|
|
self.instances = {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_application(self, prefix):
|
|
|
|
with self.lock:
|
|
|
|
app = self.instances.get(prefix)
|
|
|
|
if app is None:
|
|
|
|
app = self.create_app(prefix)
|
|
|
|
if app is not None:
|
|
|
|
self.instances[prefix] = app
|
|
|
|
return app
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
|
|
|
|
app = self.get_application(peek_path_info(environ))
|
|
|
|
if app is not None:
|
|
|
|
pop_path_info(environ)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
app = self.default_app
|
|
|
|
return app(environ, start_response)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The big difference between this and the subdomain one is that this one
|
|
|
|
falls back to another application if the creator function returns ``None``::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from myapplication import create_app, default_app, get_user_for_prefix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def make_app(prefix):
|
|
|
|
user = get_user_for_prefix(prefix)
|
|
|
|
if user is not None:
|
|
|
|
return create_app(user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
application = PathDispatcher(default_app, make_app)
|