Browse Source

Fixed formatting

pull/112/head
Armin Ronacher 15 years ago
parent
commit
2401d86008
  1. 16
      extreview/approved.rst
  2. 60
      extreview/listed.rst
  3. 18
      extreview/unlisted.rst

16
extreview/approved.rst

@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ track the extension approval process.
Flask-Babel
-----------
First Approval: 2010-07-23
Last Review: 2010-07-23
Approved version: 0.6
Approved license: BSD
:First Approval: 2010-07-23
:Last Review: 2010-07-23
:Approved version: 0.6
:Approved license: BSD
Notes: Developed by the Flask development head
@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ How to improve: add a better long description to the next release
Flask-SQLAlchemy
----------------
First Approval: 2010-07-25
Last Review: 2010-07-25
Approved version: 0.9
Approved license: BSD
:First Approval: 2010-07-25
:Last Review: 2010-07-25
:Approved version: 0.9
:Approved license: BSD
Notes: Developed by the Flask development head

60
extreview/listed.rst

@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ contain extensions that are approved.
Flask-CouchDB
-------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed version: 0.2
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed version: 0.2
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test".
Flask-CouchDBKit
----------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test".
Flask-Creole
------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ file is empty.
flask-csrf
----------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2
Will not be approved because this is functionality that should be handled
in the form handling systems which is for Flask-WTF already the case.
@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ Considered for unlisting.
Flask-Genshi
------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.3
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.3
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ requirement for approved extensions.
flask-lesscss
-------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.9.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.9.1
Broken package description, nonconforming package name, does not follow
standard API rules (init_lesscss instead of lesscss).
@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ as a testsuite.
flask-mail
----------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.3.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.3.1
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ but I don't see any big design problems there.
Flask-OAuth
-----------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.9
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.9
Short long description, missing tests.
@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ Short long description, missing tests.
Flask-OpenID
------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 1.0.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 1.0.1
Short long description, missing tests.
@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ Short long description, missing tests.
Flask-Script
------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ description" in the package index though.
Flask-Testing
-------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test".
Flask-Themes
------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.1
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test".
Flask-Uploads
-------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.1
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test".
Flask-WTF
---------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2.1
Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist
package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test".
Flask-XML-RPC
-------------
Last-Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed Version: 0.2.1
:Last-Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed Version: 0.2.1
Missing tests, API wise it would be fine for approval.

18
extreview/unlisted.rst

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
Rejected Extensions
Unlisted Extensions
===================
This is a list of extensions that is currently rejected from listing and
@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ improved to be listed.
Flask-Actions
-------------
Last Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed version: 0.2
:Last Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed version: 0.2
Rejected because of missing description in PyPI, formatting issues with
the documentation (missing headlines, scrollbars etc.) and a general clash
@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ Futhermore it also has an egg registered with an invalid filename.
Flask-Jinja2Extender
--------------------
Last Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed version: 0.1
:Last Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed version: 0.1
Usecase not obvious, hacky implementation, does not solve a problem that
could not be solved with Flask itself. I suppose it is to aid other
@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ extensions, but that should be discussed on the mailinglist.
Flask-Markdown
--------------
Last Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed version: 0.2
:Last Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed version: 0.2
Would be great for enlisting but it should follow the API of Flask-Creole.
Besides that, the docstrings are not valid rst (run through rst2html to
@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ see the issue) and it is missing tests. Otherwise fine :)
flask-urls
----------
Last Review: 2010-07-25
Reviewed version: 0.9.2
:Last Review: 2010-07-25
:Reviewed version: 0.9.2
Broken PyPI index and non-conforming extension name. Due to the small
featureset this was also delisted from the list. It was there previously

Loading…
Cancel
Save