mirror of https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask.git
Armin Ronacher
13 years ago
10 changed files with 287 additions and 64 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
||||
.. _app_context: |
||||
|
||||
The Application Context |
||||
======================= |
||||
|
||||
.. versionadded:: 0.9 |
||||
|
||||
One of the design ideas behind Flask is that there are two different |
||||
“states” in which code is executed. The application setup state in which |
||||
the application implicitly is on the module level. It starts when the |
||||
:class:`Flask` object is instantiated, and it implicitly ends when the |
||||
first request comes in. While the application is in this state a few |
||||
assumptions are true: |
||||
|
||||
- the programmer can modify the application object safely. |
||||
- no request handling happened so far |
||||
- you have to have a reference to the application object in order to |
||||
modify it, there is no magic proxy that can give you a reference to |
||||
the application object you're currently creating or modifying. |
||||
|
||||
On the contrast, during request handling, a couple of other rules exist: |
||||
|
||||
- while a request is active, the context local objects |
||||
(:data:`flask.request` and others) point to the current request. |
||||
- any code can get hold of these objects at any time. |
||||
|
||||
There is a third state which is sitting in between a little bit. |
||||
Sometimes you are dealing with an application in a way that is similar to |
||||
how you interact with applications during request handling just that there |
||||
is no request active. Consider for instance that you're sitting in an |
||||
interactive Python shell and interacting with the application, or a |
||||
command line application. |
||||
|
||||
The application context is what powers the :data:`~flask.current_app` |
||||
context local. |
||||
|
||||
Purpose of the Application Context |
||||
---------------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
The main reason for the application's context existance is that in the |
||||
past a bunch of functionality was attached to the request context in lack |
||||
of a better solution. Since one of the pillar's of Flask's design is that |
||||
you can have more than one application in the same Python process. |
||||
|
||||
So how does the code find the “right” application? In the past we |
||||
recommended passing applications around explicitly, but that caused issues |
||||
with libraries that were not designed with that in mind for libraries for |
||||
which it was too inconvenient to make this work. |
||||
|
||||
A common workaround for that problem was to use the |
||||
:data:`~flask.current_app` proxy later on, which was bound to the current |
||||
request's application reference. Since however creating such a request |
||||
context is an unnecessarily expensive operation in case there is no |
||||
request around, the application context was introduced. |
||||
|
||||
Creating an Application Context |
||||
------------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
To make an application context there are two ways. The first one is the |
||||
implicit one: whenever a request context is pushed, an application context |
||||
will be created alongside if this is necessary. As a result of that, you |
||||
can ignore the existance of the application context unless you need it. |
||||
|
||||
The second way is the explicit way using the |
||||
:meth:`~flask.Flask.app_context` method:: |
||||
|
||||
from flask import Flask, current_app |
||||
|
||||
app = Flask(__name__) |
||||
with app.app_context(): |
||||
# within this block, current_app points to app. |
||||
print current_app.name |
||||
|
||||
The application context is also used by the :func:`~flask.url_for` |
||||
function in case a ``SERVER_NAME`` was configured. This allows you to |
||||
generate URLs even in the absence of a request. |
||||
|
||||
Locality of the Context |
||||
----------------------- |
||||
|
||||
The application context is created and destroyed as necessary. It never |
||||
moves between threads and it will not be shared between requests. As such |
||||
it is the perfect place to store database connection information and other |
||||
things. The internal stack object is called :data:`flask._app_ctx_stack`. |
||||
Extensions are free to store additional information on the topmost level, |
||||
assuming they pick a sufficiently unique name. |
||||
|
||||
For more information about that, see :ref:`extension-dev`. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue