mirror of https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
106 lines
4.6 KiB
106 lines
4.6 KiB
Security Considerations |
|
======================= |
|
|
|
Web applications usually face all kinds of security problems and it's very |
|
hard to get everything right. Flask tries to solve a few of these things |
|
for you, but there are a couple more you have to take care of yourself. |
|
|
|
.. _xss: |
|
|
|
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) |
|
-------------------------- |
|
|
|
Cross site scripting is the concept of injecting arbitrary HTML (and with |
|
it JavaScript) into the context of a website. To remedy this, developers |
|
have to properly escape text so that it cannot include arbitrary HTML |
|
tags. For more information on that have a look at the Wikipedia article |
|
on `Cross-Site Scripting |
|
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting>`_. |
|
|
|
Flask configures Jinja2 to automatically escape all values unless |
|
explicitly told otherwise. This should rule out all XSS problems caused |
|
in templates, but there are still other places where you have to be |
|
careful: |
|
|
|
- generating HTML without the help of Jinja2 |
|
- calling :class:`~flask.Markup` on data submitted by users |
|
- sending out HTML from uploaded files, never do that, use the |
|
``Content-Disposition: attachment`` header to prevent that problem. |
|
- sending out textfiles from uploaded files. Some browsers are using |
|
content-type guessing based on the first few bytes so users could |
|
trick a browser to execute HTML. |
|
|
|
Another thing that is very important are unquoted attributes. While |
|
Jinja2 can protect you from XSS issues by escaping HTML, there is one |
|
thing it cannot protect you from: XSS by attribute injection. To counter |
|
this possible attack vector, be sure to always quote your attributes with |
|
either double or single quotes when using Jinja expressions in them: |
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: html+jinja |
|
|
|
<a href="{{ href }}">the text</a> |
|
|
|
Why is this necessary? Because if you would not be doing that, an |
|
attacker could easily inject custom JavaScript handlers. For example an |
|
attacker could inject this piece of HTML+JavaScript: |
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: html |
|
|
|
onmouseover=alert(document.cookie) |
|
|
|
When the user would then move with the mouse over the link, the cookie |
|
would be presented to the user in an alert window. But instead of showing |
|
the cookie to the user, a good attacker might also execute any other |
|
JavaScript code. In combination with CSS injections the attacker might |
|
even make the element fill out the entire page so that the user would |
|
just have to have the mouse anywhere on the page to trigger the attack. |
|
|
|
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) |
|
--------------------------------- |
|
|
|
Another big problem is CSRF. This is a very complex topic and I won't |
|
outline it here in detail just mention what it is and how to theoretically |
|
prevent it. |
|
|
|
If your authentication information is stored in cookies, you have implicit |
|
state management. The state of "being logged in" is controlled by a |
|
cookie, and that cookie is sent with each request to a page. |
|
Unfortunately that includes requests triggered by 3rd party sites. If you |
|
don't keep that in mind, some people might be able to trick your |
|
application's users with social engineering to do stupid things without |
|
them knowing. |
|
|
|
Say you have a specific URL that, when you sent ``POST`` requests to will |
|
delete a user's profile (say ``http://example.com/user/delete``). If an |
|
attacker now creates a page that sends a post request to that page with |
|
some JavaScript they just have to trick some users to load that page and |
|
their profiles will end up being deleted. |
|
|
|
Imagine you were to run Facebook with millions of concurrent users and |
|
someone would send out links to images of little kittens. When users |
|
would go to that page, their profiles would get deleted while they are |
|
looking at images of fluffy cats. |
|
|
|
How can you prevent that? Basically for each request that modifies |
|
content on the server you would have to either use a one-time token and |
|
store that in the cookie **and** also transmit it with the form data. |
|
After receiving the data on the server again, you would then have to |
|
compare the two tokens and ensure they are equal. |
|
|
|
Why does Flask not do that for you? The ideal place for this to happen is |
|
the form validation framework, which does not exist in Flask. |
|
|
|
.. _json-security: |
|
|
|
JSON Security |
|
------------- |
|
|
|
In Flask 0.10 and lower, :func:`~flask.jsonify` did not serialize top-level |
|
arrays to JSON. This was because of a security vulnerability in ECMAScript 4. |
|
|
|
ECMAScript 5 closed this vulnerability, so only extremely old browsers are |
|
still vulnerable. All of these browsers have `other more serious |
|
vulnerabilities |
|
<https://github.com/pallets/flask/issues/248#issuecomment-59934857>`_, so |
|
this behavior was changed and :func:`~flask.jsonify` now supports serializing |
|
arrays.
|
|
|