mirror of https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
223 lines
9.0 KiB
223 lines
9.0 KiB
.. _request-context: |
|
|
|
The Request Context |
|
=================== |
|
|
|
This document describes the behavior in Flask 0.7 which is mostly in line |
|
with the old behavior but has some small, subtle differences. |
|
|
|
It is recommended that you read the :ref:`app-context` chapter first. |
|
|
|
Diving into Context Locals |
|
-------------------------- |
|
|
|
Say you have a utility function that returns the URL the user should be |
|
redirected to. Imagine it would always redirect to the URL's ``next`` |
|
parameter or the HTTP referrer or the index page:: |
|
|
|
from flask import request, url_for |
|
|
|
def redirect_url(): |
|
return request.args.get('next') or \ |
|
request.referrer or \ |
|
url_for('index') |
|
|
|
As you can see, it accesses the request object. If you try to run this |
|
from a plain Python shell, this is the exception you will see: |
|
|
|
>>> redirect_url() |
|
Traceback (most recent call last): |
|
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> |
|
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'request' |
|
|
|
That makes a lot of sense because we currently do not have a request we |
|
could access. So we have to make a request and bind it to the current |
|
context. The :attr:`~flask.Flask.test_request_context` method can create |
|
us a :class:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext`: |
|
|
|
>>> ctx = app.test_request_context('/?next=http://example.com/') |
|
|
|
This context can be used in two ways. Either with the `with` statement |
|
or by calling the :meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.push` and |
|
:meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.pop` methods: |
|
|
|
>>> ctx.push() |
|
|
|
From that point onwards you can work with the request object: |
|
|
|
>>> redirect_url() |
|
u'http://example.com/' |
|
|
|
Until you call `pop`: |
|
|
|
>>> ctx.pop() |
|
|
|
Because the request context is internally maintained as a stack you can |
|
push and pop multiple times. This is very handy to implement things like |
|
internal redirects. |
|
|
|
For more information of how to utilize the request context from the |
|
interactive Python shell, head over to the :ref:`shell` chapter. |
|
|
|
How the Context Works |
|
--------------------- |
|
|
|
If you look into how the Flask WSGI application internally works, you will |
|
find a piece of code that looks very much like this:: |
|
|
|
def wsgi_app(self, environ): |
|
with self.request_context(environ): |
|
try: |
|
response = self.full_dispatch_request() |
|
except Exception, e: |
|
response = self.make_response(self.handle_exception(e)) |
|
return response(environ, start_response) |
|
|
|
The method :meth:`~Flask.request_context` returns a new |
|
:class:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext` object and uses it in combination with |
|
the `with` statement to bind the context. Everything that is called from |
|
the same thread from this point onwards until the end of the `with` |
|
statement will have access to the request globals (:data:`flask.request` |
|
and others). |
|
|
|
The request context internally works like a stack: The topmost level on |
|
the stack is the current active request. |
|
:meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.push` adds the context to the stack on |
|
the very top, :meth:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext.pop` removes it from the |
|
stack again. On popping the application's |
|
:func:`~flask.Flask.teardown_request` functions are also executed. |
|
|
|
Another thing of note is that the request context will automatically also |
|
create an :ref:`application context <app-context>` when it's pushed and |
|
there is no application context for that application so far. |
|
|
|
.. _callbacks-and-errors: |
|
|
|
Callbacks and Errors |
|
-------------------- |
|
|
|
What happens if an error occurs in Flask during request processing? This |
|
particular behavior changed in 0.7 because we wanted to make it easier to |
|
understand what is actually happening. The new behavior is quite simple: |
|
|
|
1. Before each request, :meth:`~flask.Flask.before_request` functions are |
|
executed. If one of these functions return a response, the other |
|
functions are no longer called. In any case however the return value |
|
is treated as a replacement for the view's return value. |
|
|
|
2. If the :meth:`~flask.Flask.before_request` functions did not return a |
|
response, the regular request handling kicks in and the view function |
|
that was matched has the chance to return a response. |
|
|
|
3. The return value of the view is then converted into an actual response |
|
object and handed over to the :meth:`~flask.Flask.after_request` |
|
functions which have the chance to replace it or modify it in place. |
|
|
|
4. At the end of the request the :meth:`~flask.Flask.teardown_request` |
|
functions are executed. This always happens, even in case of an |
|
unhandled exception down the road or if a before-request handler was |
|
not executed yet or at all (for example in test environments sometimes |
|
you might want to not execute before-request callbacks). |
|
|
|
Now what happens on errors? In production mode if an exception is not |
|
caught, the 500 internal server handler is called. In development mode |
|
however the exception is not further processed and bubbles up to the WSGI |
|
server. That way things like the interactive debugger can provide helpful |
|
debug information. |
|
|
|
An important change in 0.7 is that the internal server error is now no |
|
longer post processed by the after request callbacks and after request |
|
callbacks are no longer guaranteed to be executed. This way the internal |
|
dispatching code looks cleaner and is easier to customize and understand. |
|
|
|
The new teardown functions are supposed to be used as a replacement for |
|
things that absolutely need to happen at the end of request. |
|
|
|
Teardown Callbacks |
|
------------------ |
|
|
|
The teardown callbacks are special callbacks in that they are executed at |
|
at different point. Strictly speaking they are independent of the actual |
|
request handling as they are bound to the lifecycle of the |
|
:class:`~flask.ctx.RequestContext` object. When the request context is |
|
popped, the :meth:`~flask.Flask.teardown_request` functions are called. |
|
|
|
This is important to know if the life of the request context is prolonged |
|
by using the test client in a with statement or when using the request |
|
context from the command line:: |
|
|
|
with app.test_client() as client: |
|
resp = client.get('/foo') |
|
# the teardown functions are still not called at that point |
|
# even though the response ended and you have the response |
|
# object in your hand |
|
|
|
# only when the code reaches this point the teardown functions |
|
# are called. Alternatively the same thing happens if another |
|
# request was triggered from the test client |
|
|
|
It's easy to see the behavior from the command line: |
|
|
|
>>> app = Flask(__name__) |
|
>>> @app.teardown_request |
|
... def teardown_request(exception=None): |
|
... print 'this runs after request' |
|
... |
|
>>> ctx = app.test_request_context() |
|
>>> ctx.push() |
|
>>> ctx.pop() |
|
this runs after request |
|
>>> |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that teardown callbacks are always executed, even if |
|
before-request callbacks were not executed yet but an exception happened. |
|
Certain parts of the test system might also temporarily create a request |
|
context without calling the before-request handlers. Make sure to write |
|
your teardown-request handlers in a way that they will never fail. |
|
|
|
.. _notes-on-proxies: |
|
|
|
Notes On Proxies |
|
---------------- |
|
|
|
Some of the objects provided by Flask are proxies to other objects. The |
|
reason behind this is that these proxies are shared between threads and |
|
they have to dispatch to the actual object bound to a thread behind the |
|
scenes as necessary. |
|
|
|
Most of the time you don't have to care about that, but there are some |
|
exceptions where it is good to know that this object is an actual proxy: |
|
|
|
- The proxy objects do not fake their inherited types, so if you want to |
|
perform actual instance checks, you have to do that on the instance |
|
that is being proxied (see `_get_current_object` below). |
|
- if the object reference is important (so for example for sending |
|
:ref:`signals`) |
|
|
|
If you need to get access to the underlying object that is proxied, you |
|
can use the :meth:`~werkzeug.local.LocalProxy._get_current_object` method:: |
|
|
|
app = current_app._get_current_object() |
|
my_signal.send(app) |
|
|
|
Context Preservation on Error |
|
----------------------------- |
|
|
|
If an error occurs or not, at the end of the request the request context |
|
is popped and all data associated with it is destroyed. During |
|
development however that can be problematic as you might want to have the |
|
information around for a longer time in case an exception occurred. In |
|
Flask 0.6 and earlier in debug mode, if an exception occurred, the |
|
request context was not popped so that the interactive debugger can still |
|
provide you with important information. |
|
|
|
Starting with Flask 0.7 you have finer control over that behavior by |
|
setting the ``PRESERVE_CONTEXT_ON_EXCEPTION`` configuration variable. By |
|
default it's linked to the setting of ``DEBUG``. If the application is in |
|
debug mode the context is preserved, in production mode it's not. |
|
|
|
Do not force activate ``PRESERVE_CONTEXT_ON_EXCEPTION`` in production mode |
|
as it will cause your application to leak memory on exceptions. However |
|
it can be useful during development to get the same error preserving |
|
behavior as in development mode when attempting to debug an error that |
|
only occurs under production settings.
|
|
|