mirror of https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
144 lines
5.5 KiB
144 lines
5.5 KiB
.. _app-context: |
|
|
|
The Application Context |
|
======================= |
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 0.9 |
|
|
|
One of the design ideas behind Flask is that there are at least two |
|
different “states” in which code is executed: |
|
|
|
1. The application setup state, in which the application implicitly is |
|
on the module level. |
|
|
|
This state starts when the :class:`Flask` object is instantiated, and |
|
it implicitly ends when the first request comes in. While the |
|
application is in this state, a few assumptions are true: |
|
|
|
- the programmer can modify the application object safely. |
|
- no request handling happened so far |
|
- you have to have a reference to the application object in order to |
|
modify it, there is no magic proxy that can give you a reference to |
|
the application object you're currently creating or modifying. |
|
|
|
2. In contrast, in the request handling state, a couple of other rules |
|
exist: |
|
|
|
- while a request is active, the context local objects |
|
(:data:`flask.request` and others) point to the current request. |
|
- any code can get hold of these objects at any time. |
|
|
|
3. There is also a third state somewhere in between 'module-level' and |
|
'request-handling': |
|
|
|
Sometimes you are dealing with an application in a way that is similar to |
|
how you interact with applications during request handling, but without |
|
there being an active request. Consider, for instance, that you're |
|
sitting in an interactive Python shell and interacting with the |
|
application, or a command line application. |
|
|
|
The application context is what powers the :data:`~flask.current_app` |
|
context local. |
|
|
|
Purpose of the Application Context |
|
---------------------------------- |
|
|
|
The main reason for the application's context existence is that in the |
|
past a bunch of functionality was attached to the request context for lack |
|
of a better solution. Since one of the pillars of Flask's design is that |
|
you can have more than one application in the same Python process. |
|
|
|
So how does the code find the “right” application? In the past we |
|
recommended passing applications around explicitly, but that caused issues |
|
with libraries that were not designed with that in mind. |
|
|
|
A common workaround for that problem was to use the |
|
:data:`~flask.current_app` proxy later on, which was bound to the current |
|
request's application reference. Since creating such a request context is |
|
an unnecessarily expensive operation in case there is no request around, |
|
the application context was introduced. |
|
|
|
Creating an Application Context |
|
------------------------------- |
|
|
|
There are two ways to make an application context. The first one is |
|
implicit: whenever a request context is pushed, an application context |
|
will be created alongside if this is necessary. As a result, you can |
|
ignore the existence of the application context unless you need it. |
|
|
|
The second way is the explicit way using the |
|
:meth:`~flask.Flask.app_context` method:: |
|
|
|
from flask import Flask, current_app |
|
|
|
app = Flask(__name__) |
|
with app.app_context(): |
|
# within this block, current_app points to app. |
|
print current_app.name |
|
|
|
The application context is also used by the :func:`~flask.url_for` |
|
function in case a ``SERVER_NAME`` was configured. This allows you to |
|
generate URLs even in the absence of a request. |
|
|
|
If no request context has been pushed and an application context has |
|
not been explicitly set, a ``RuntimeError`` will be raised. :: |
|
|
|
RuntimeError: Working outside of application context. |
|
|
|
Locality of the Context |
|
----------------------- |
|
|
|
The application context is created and destroyed as necessary. It never |
|
moves between threads and it will not be shared between requests. As such |
|
it is the perfect place to store database connection information and other |
|
things. The internal stack object is called :data:`flask._app_ctx_stack`. |
|
Extensions are free to store additional information on the topmost level, |
|
assuming they pick a sufficiently unique name and should put their |
|
information there, instead of on the :data:`flask.g` object which is reserved |
|
for user code. |
|
|
|
For more information about that, see :ref:`extension-dev`. |
|
|
|
Context Usage |
|
------------- |
|
|
|
The context is typically used to cache resources that need to be created |
|
on a per-request or usage case. For instance, database connections are |
|
destined to go there. When storing things on the application context |
|
unique names should be chosen as this is a place that is shared between |
|
Flask applications and extensions. |
|
|
|
The most common usage is to split resource management into two parts: |
|
|
|
1. an implicit resource caching on the context. |
|
2. a context teardown based resource deallocation. |
|
|
|
Generally there would be a ``get_X()`` function that creates resource |
|
``X`` if it does not exist yet and otherwise returns the same resource, |
|
and a ``teardown_X()`` function that is registered as teardown handler. |
|
|
|
This is an example that connects to a database:: |
|
|
|
import sqlite3 |
|
from flask import g |
|
|
|
def get_db(): |
|
db = getattr(g, '_database', None) |
|
if db is None: |
|
db = g._database = connect_to_database() |
|
return db |
|
|
|
@app.teardown_appcontext |
|
def teardown_db(exception): |
|
db = getattr(g, '_database', None) |
|
if db is not None: |
|
db.close() |
|
|
|
The first time ``get_db()`` is called the connection will be established. |
|
To make this implicit a :class:`~werkzeug.local.LocalProxy` can be used:: |
|
|
|
from werkzeug.local import LocalProxy |
|
db = LocalProxy(get_db) |
|
|
|
That way a user can directly access ``db`` which internally calls |
|
``get_db()``.
|
|
|