|
|
@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ msgs_found_sel( sync_vars_t *svars, int t ) |
|
|
|
* One solution would be using binary search on an index array. |
|
|
|
* One solution would be using binary search on an index array. |
|
|
|
* msgs are already sorted by UID, srecs would have to be sorted by uid[t]. |
|
|
|
* msgs are already sorted by UID, srecs would have to be sorted by uid[t]. |
|
|
|
*/ |
|
|
|
*/ |
|
|
|
debug( "matching messages against sync records\n" ); |
|
|
|
debug( "matching messages on %s against sync records\n", str_ms[t] ); |
|
|
|
for (tmsg = svars->ctx[t]->msgs; tmsg; tmsg = tmsg->next) { |
|
|
|
for (tmsg = svars->ctx[t]->msgs; tmsg; tmsg = tmsg->next) { |
|
|
|
uid = tmsg->uid; |
|
|
|
uid = tmsg->uid; |
|
|
|
if (DFlags & DEBUG) { |
|
|
|
if (DFlags & DEBUG) { |
|
|
|