|
|
|
.. _app-context:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Application Context
|
|
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the design ideas behind Flask is that there are at least two
|
|
|
|
different “states” in which code is executed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The application setup state, in which the application implicitly is
|
|
|
|
on the module level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This state starts when the :class:`Flask` object is instantiated, and
|
|
|
|
it implicitly ends when the first request comes in. While the
|
|
|
|
application is in this state, a few assumptions are true:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- the programmer can modify the application object safely.
|
|
|
|
- no request handling happened so far
|
|
|
|
- you have to have a reference to the application object in order to
|
|
|
|
modify it, there is no magic proxy that can give you a reference to
|
|
|
|
the application object you're currently creating or modifying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. In contrast, in the request handling state, a couple of other rules
|
|
|
|
exist:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- while a request is active, the context local objects
|
|
|
|
(:data:`flask.request` and others) point to the current request.
|
|
|
|
- any code can get hold of these objects at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. There is also a third state somewhere in between 'module-level' and
|
|
|
|
'request-handling':
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you are dealing with an application in a way that is similar to
|
|
|
|
how you interact with applications during request handling, but without
|
|
|
|
there being an active request. Consider, for instance, that you're
|
|
|
|
sitting in an interactive Python shell and interacting with the
|
|
|
|
application, or a command line application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application context is what powers the :data:`~flask.current_app`
|
|
|
|
context local.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose of the Application Context
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main reason for the application's context existence is that in the
|
|
|
|
past a bunch of functionality was attached to the request context for lack
|
|
|
|
of a better solution. Since one of the pillars of Flask's design is that
|
|
|
|
you can have more than one application in the same Python process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how does the code find the “right” application? In the past we
|
|
|
|
recommended passing applications around explicitly, but that caused issues
|
|
|
|
with libraries that were not designed with that in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A common workaround for that problem was to use the
|
|
|
|
:data:`~flask.current_app` proxy later on, which was bound to the current
|
|
|
|
request's application reference. Since creating such a request context is
|
|
|
|
an unnecessarily expensive operation in case there is no request around,
|
|
|
|
the application context was introduced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creating an Application Context
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to make an application context. The first one is
|
|
|
|
implicit: whenever a request context is pushed, an application context
|
|
|
|
will be created alongside if this is necessary. As a result, you can
|
|
|
|
ignore the existence of the application context unless you need it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second way is the explicit way using the
|
|
|
|
:meth:`~flask.Flask.app_context` method::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from flask import Flask, current_app
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
app = Flask(__name__)
|
|
|
|
with app.app_context():
|
|
|
|
# within this block, current_app points to app.
|
|
|
|
print current_app.name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application context is also used by the :func:`~flask.url_for`
|
|
|
|
function in case a ``SERVER_NAME`` was configured. This allows you to
|
|
|
|
generate URLs even in the absence of a request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no request context has been pushed and an application context has
|
|
|
|
not been explicitly set, a ``RuntimeError`` will be raised. ::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RuntimeError: Working outside of application context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locality of the Context
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application context is created and destroyed as necessary. It never
|
|
|
|
moves between threads and it will not be shared between requests. As such
|
|
|
|
it is the perfect place to store database connection information and other
|
|
|
|
things. The internal stack object is called :data:`flask._app_ctx_stack`.
|
|
|
|
Extensions are free to store additional information on the topmost level,
|
|
|
|
assuming they pick a sufficiently unique name and should put their
|
|
|
|
information there, instead of on the :data:`flask.g` object which is reserved
|
|
|
|
for user code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about that, see :ref:`extension-dev`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Context Usage
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The context is typically used to cache resources that need to be created
|
|
|
|
on a per-request or usage case. For instance, database connections are
|
|
|
|
destined to go there. When storing things on the application context
|
|
|
|
unique names should be chosen as this is a place that is shared between
|
|
|
|
Flask applications and extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most common usage is to split resource management into two parts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. an implicit resource caching on the context.
|
|
|
|
2. a context teardown based resource deallocation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally there would be a ``get_X()`` function that creates resource
|
|
|
|
``X`` if it does not exist yet and otherwise returns the same resource,
|
|
|
|
and a ``teardown_X()`` function that is registered as teardown handler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an example that connects to a database::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import sqlite3
|
|
|
|
from flask import g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_db():
|
|
|
|
db = getattr(g, '_database', None)
|
|
|
|
if db is None:
|
|
|
|
db = g._database = connect_to_database()
|
|
|
|
return db
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@app.teardown_appcontext
|
|
|
|
def teardown_db(exception):
|
|
|
|
db = getattr(g, '_database', None)
|
|
|
|
if db is not None:
|
|
|
|
db.close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first time ``get_db()`` is called the connection will be established.
|
|
|
|
To make this implicit a :class:`~werkzeug.local.LocalProxy` can be used::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from werkzeug.local import LocalProxy
|
|
|
|
db = LocalProxy(get_db)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That way a user can directly access ``db`` which internally calls
|
|
|
|
``get_db()``.
|