|
|
|
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ the XHTML syntax over the syntax defined by the specification.
|
|
|
|
|
In 2007, the specification was adopted as the basis of a new HTML |
|
|
|
|
specification under the umbrella of the W3C, known as HTML5. Currently, |
|
|
|
|
it appears that XHTML is losing traction, as the XHTML 2 working group has |
|
|
|
|
een disbanded and HTML5 is being implemented by all major browser vendors. |
|
|
|
|
been disbanded and HTML5 is being implemented by all major browser vendors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HTML versus XHTML |
|
|
|
|
----------------- |
|
|
|
@ -204,4 +204,4 @@ reasons given above:
|
|
|
|
|
- It has the support of most browser vendors behind it. |
|
|
|
|
- It is much easier to write, and more compact. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For most applications, it is undoubtably better to use HTML5 than XHTML. |
|
|
|
|
For most applications, it is undoubtedly better to use HTML5 than XHTML. |
|
|
|
|