mirror of https://github.com/mitsuhiko/flask.git
Armin Ronacher
14 years ago
3 changed files with 159 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ |
|||||||
|
.. _app-dispatch: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Application Dispatching |
||||||
|
======================= |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Application dispatching is the process of combining multiple Flask |
||||||
|
applications on the WSGI level. You can not only combine Flask |
||||||
|
applications into something larger but any WSGI application. This would |
||||||
|
even allow you to run a Django and a Flask application in the same |
||||||
|
interpreter side by side if you want. The usefulness of this depends on |
||||||
|
how the applications work internally. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The fundamental difference from the :ref:`module approach |
||||||
|
<larger-applications>` is that in this case you are running the same or |
||||||
|
different Flask applications that are entirely isolated from each other. |
||||||
|
They run different configurations and are dispatched on the WSGI level. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Combining Applications |
||||||
|
---------------------- |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If you have entirely separated applications and you want them to work next |
||||||
|
to each other in the same Python interpreter process you can take |
||||||
|
advantage of the :class:`werkzeug.wsgi.DispatcherMiddleware`. The idea |
||||||
|
here is that each Flask application is a valid WSGI application and they |
||||||
|
are combined by the dispatcher middleware into a larger one that |
||||||
|
dispatched based on prefix. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For example you could have your main application run on `/` and your |
||||||
|
backend interface on `/admin`:: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from werkzeug.wsgi import DispatcherMiddleware |
||||||
|
from frontend_app import application as frontend |
||||||
|
from backend_app import application as backend |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
application = DispatcherMiddleware(frontend, { |
||||||
|
'/backend': backend |
||||||
|
}) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dispatch by Subdomain |
||||||
|
--------------------- |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Sometimes you might want to use multiple instances of the same application |
||||||
|
with different configurations. Assuming the application is created inside |
||||||
|
a function and you can call that function to instanciate it, that is |
||||||
|
really easy to implement. In order to develop your application to support |
||||||
|
creating new instances in functions have a look at the |
||||||
|
:ref:`app-factories` pattern. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A very common example would be creating applications per subdomain. For |
||||||
|
instance you configure your webserver to dispatch all requests for all |
||||||
|
subdomains to your application and you then use the subdomain information |
||||||
|
to create user-specific instances. Once you have your server set up to |
||||||
|
listen on all subdomains you can use a very simple WSGI application to do |
||||||
|
the dynamic application creation. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The perfect level for abstraction in that regard is the WSGI layer. You |
||||||
|
write your own WSGI application that looks at the request that comes and |
||||||
|
and delegates it to your Flask application. If that application does not |
||||||
|
exist yet, it is dynamically created and remembered:: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from threading import Lock |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
class SubdomainDispatcher(object): |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def __init__(self, domain, create_app): |
||||||
|
self.domain = domain |
||||||
|
self.create_app = create_app |
||||||
|
self.lock = Lock() |
||||||
|
self.instances = {} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def get_application(self, host): |
||||||
|
host = host.split(':')[0] |
||||||
|
assert host.endswith(self.domain), 'Configuration error' |
||||||
|
subdomain = host[:-len(self.domain)].rstrip('.') |
||||||
|
with self.lock: |
||||||
|
app = self.instances.get(subdomain) |
||||||
|
if app is None: |
||||||
|
app = self.create_app(subdomain) |
||||||
|
self.instances[subdomain] = app |
||||||
|
return app |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def __call__(self, environ, start_response): |
||||||
|
app = self.get_application(environ['HTTP_HOST']) |
||||||
|
return app(environ, start_response) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This dispatcher can then be used like this:: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from myapplication import create_app, get_user_for_subdomain |
||||||
|
from werkzeug.exceptions import NotFound |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def make_app(subdomain): |
||||||
|
user = get_user_for_subdomain(subdomain) |
||||||
|
if user is None: |
||||||
|
# if there is no user for that subdomain we still have |
||||||
|
# to return a WSGI application that handles that request. |
||||||
|
# We can then just return the NotFound() exception as |
||||||
|
# application which will render a default 404 page. |
||||||
|
# You might also redirect the user to the main page then |
||||||
|
return NotFound() |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# otherwise create the application for the specific user |
||||||
|
return create_app(user) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
application = SubdomainDispatcher('example.com', make_app) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dispatch by Path |
||||||
|
---------------- |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dispatching by a path on the URL is very similar. Instead of looking at |
||||||
|
the `Host` header to figure out the subdomain one simply looks at the |
||||||
|
request path up to the first slash:: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from threading import Lock |
||||||
|
from werkzeug.wsgi import pop_path_info, peek_path_info |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
class PathDispatcher(object): |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def __init__(self, default_app, create_app): |
||||||
|
self.default_app = default_app |
||||||
|
self.create_app = create_app |
||||||
|
self.lock = Lock() |
||||||
|
self.instances = {} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def get_application(self, prefix): |
||||||
|
with self.lock: |
||||||
|
app = self.instances.get(prefix) |
||||||
|
if app is None: |
||||||
|
app = self.create_app(prefix) |
||||||
|
if app is not None: |
||||||
|
self.instances[prefix] = app |
||||||
|
return app |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def __call__(self, environ, start_response): |
||||||
|
app = self.get_application(peek_path_info(environ)) |
||||||
|
if app is not None: |
||||||
|
pop_path_info(environ) |
||||||
|
else: |
||||||
|
app = self.default_app |
||||||
|
return app(environ, start_response) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The big difference between this and the subdomain one is that this one |
||||||
|
falls back to another application if the creator function returns `None`:: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from myapplication import create_app, default_app, get_user_for_prefix |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def make_app(prefix): |
||||||
|
user = get_user_for_prefix(prefix) |
||||||
|
if user is not None: |
||||||
|
return create_app(user) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
application = PathDispatcher('example.com', default_app, make_app) |
Loading…
Reference in new issue